Publications

Research in the public record

Searchlight provides short-form analysis of emerging signals. Research Briefs develop focused institutional questions. Horizon Scans synthesize changing landscapes. The planned HSI Outlook will bring work across the four programs together.

Our research framework

Compound transition

The term

The condition in which technological, human, planetary, and geopolitical change stop arriving in sequence and begin arriving together, so that an institution’s response to any one of them constrains its response to the rest.

Each form of change has a substantial body of research. HSI asks when their interaction creates institutional constraints that single-domain analysis may miss.

Many organizations assign technology, workforce, environmental, and geopolitical questions to separate functions. HSI studies the cases in which decisions across those functions become materially dependent on one another, and the choices those dependencies create or foreclose.

Our purpose is not forecasting for its own sake. It is to help institutions remain capable, legitimate, and humane through the transitions ahead.

The framework asks which present decisions preserve institutional capacity for what comes next.

The four questions we apply across every project
01

What is changing?

The signal beneath the news: capability shifts, regulatory movement, and structural change that has not yet been named.

02

What does it require of people?

The capability, judgment, and agency the change demands, and whether people are being equipped to supply it.

03

How must institutions adapt or coordinate?

What has to change inside organizations, and what has to be negotiated between them and across borders.

04

What future possibilities do today's choices preserve or foreclose?

The decisions whose consequences compound, and the optionality they either protect or quietly spend.

Our Standard

A published test for claims made under uncertainty.

The Verification Test states a claim, the evidence that would support it, and the evidence that would weaken or falsify it. HSI uses the test in Searchlight issues as one part of a broader research-integrity approach that also covers authorship, sourcing, review, disclosure, and corrections.

An example · Searchlight No. 021
Claim under test

Regulators are moving to require platforms to pay publishers for AI-generated search summaries as a use in its own right, over and above payment for training and indexing.

Evidence that would support the claim

A formal investigation opens, or interim measures land on Google tied specifically to generative summarization, on roughly the timeline the Meta order took.

Evidence that would weaken the claim

The Autorité treats the complaint as already covered by the 2022 commitments and creates no new obligation, which would suggest generative summarization is not yet a distinct licensable use in the EU framework.

Convenings

Convening around the research

The inaugural New York Salon took place in June 2026. London is scheduled for October; Tokyo is in development for 2027.

Guests seated at the long table during the inaugural HSI salon
Completed
New York
June 9, 2026
House of the Redeemer · Responsible AI · Horizon Scan 001
Senior leaders from finance, healthcare, law, government, the UN system, and academia, convened under the Chatham House Rule to test Horizon Scan 001 against the judgment of people who run regulated institutions. Read the recap →
London
Confirmed · Scheduled
London
October 7, 2026
Autumn Salon · Governance & Diplomacy · Horizon Scan 002
An evening dinner for senior governance practitioners, regulators, and HSI patrons in the week of the 4th Annual AI Regulation Summit, built around Horizon Scan 002 and where governance language acquires enforceable cost. Details →
Tokyo
In development
Tokyo
February 2027
Asia Anchor Salon · Governance & Diplomacy · Horizon Scan 003
Cross-Pacific dialogue on the industrial instruments of AI governance: compute, energy, export controls, and standards. Framed by Horizon Scan 003, developed with Japanese policy and academic partners through 2026. Details →
Work With the Institute

Partnerships and Founding Patronage

HSI welcomes relevant institutional collaborations and philanthropic support. Neither relationship confers control over research conclusions.

Partnership

Institutional partners

Research and co-publication, field access, academic collaboration, convening, and foundation funding. Partners bring questions, data, and settings the Institute could not reach alone.

Project scope, disclosure, and editorial independence are established before work begins.

How partnership works
Patronage

Founding Patrons

Founding Patrons provide general support for independent public-interest research, open governance tools, the Doctoral Fellowship, and convenings. Recognition and other benefits remain secondary to that philanthropic purpose.

Recognition in published research, subject to your preference.

Inquire about patronage
Research Independence

Partners, patrons, and funders support the mission and the pillars, but do not direct research conclusions, review work before publication, or receive editorial input. Contributions of $25,000 or more are disclosed in the HSI Outlook, and funding from foreign government or state-linked entities is reviewed and disclosed regardless of size. Current funding, disclosure, and fiscal-sponsorship information is here.